Thursday, January 20, 2011

Slaughterhouse-Five...

For my choice novel, I chose to read Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut. This story is Vonnegut's somewhat auto-biographic and mostly fictional account of the 1945 firebombing in Drensen, Germany. Slaughterhouse-Five follows the life of Billy Pilgrim and his journey of becoming unstuck in time. Billy claims to have been abducted by Tralfamadorians and taken back to their planet to be studied. Billy says that while he was there, the Tralfamadorians taught him many things. One of them being the idea that, "All moments, past, present, and future, always have existed, always will exist...It is just an illusion we have here on Earth that one moment follows another one, like beads on a string, and that once a moment is gone it is gone forever. Now, when I myself hear that somebody is dead, I simply shrug and say what the Tralfamadorians say about dead people, which is 'So it goes.'"

In contrast to this expose on the horrors of war, is Toni Morrison's Playing in the Dark. Her belief that the idea of Africanism is represented in all American texts and that without it literature would not be what it is. In her second short essay Romancing the Shadows, Morrison focuses on the metaphoric use of darkness to symbolize black and lightness to symbolize white. "These images of impenetrable whiteness need contextualizing to explain their extraordinary power, pattern, and consistency. Because they appear almost always in conjunction with representations of black or Africanist people who are dead, impotent, or under complete control, these images of blinding whiteness seem to function as both antidote for whiteness--a dark and abiding presence that moves the hearts and texts of American literature with fear and longing." When I first read this, I found Morrison's angle of our association to light being good and dark being bad to be unique. Yet after re-reading a passage from Slaughterhouse-Five, I truly realized that the points Toni Morrison was making when she said her theory of Africanism could be related to any text, even the ones not about race.

Protagonist Billy Pilgrim is on his way to Lions Club luncheon meeting. "He was stopped by a signal in the middle of Ilium's black ghetto. The people who lived here hated it so much that they had burned down a lot of it a month before. It was all they had, and they'd wrecked it. The neighborhood reminded Billy of some of the towns he had seen in the war. The curbs and sidewalk were crushed in many places, showing where the National Guard tanks and half-tracks had been." Billy's association of this black ghetto to the destruction he witnessed in Drenson, a huge theme in Slaughterhouse-Five being how destructive war can be, reinforces Morrison's ideas of white/light symbolizing what is good and dark/black symbolizing what is not.

Although, while reading Toni Morrison and Kurt Vonnegut I believed one had absolutely no correlation to the other. Yet when I sat down to analyze Slaughterhouse-Five, I found that because it was so easy to find an example of what Morrison had been proposing in a book that had little to nothing to do with race, it only helped validate her argument.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

CharityWater...

Why Water?

The link above will take you to a website that works toward making sure people in developing nations have clean water. Water scarcity is becoming an international problem, and as residents of the country that, on average, uses the most water per person this should should be a priority for us.

After reading this article, ask yourself how much water you use everyday. How much does your family  use? How much would that decrease if that water was dirty or you had to travel for it? As teenagers we are known for being self-absorbed, but hopefully reading this has some impact. I'd like to think that every time anyone leaves the water on, their mind will drift back to this.

More realistically though, that probably won't happen. So what does it take? These days there are celebrities, and campaigns that bombard people all the time. So, in your opinion, what does it take to bring a nation together to fight for something that doesn't directly effect them?

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Criticism: Sam Anderson...

Sam Anderson's view on criticism, was well not quite what i'd had in mind for criticism. His views on the changing art that is literature was optimistic. Not only did he point out that every generation curses and predicts the demise of something due to new technology, but that each generation can take that as an opportunity for growth. With things like Google, Twitter, Facebook, and other technology, the way we interpret literature has also changed. There are now a million other things we can be doing with just the click of a button. Anderson says that it is the critics job to step it up. In this new age of literature, a critic needs to be the bridge. A critic makes art in the same medium that it critiques. As Anderson  put it, in this new age of technology critics aren't just referees; they're equal players.

I agree with a lot of what Anderson had to say. There isn't a use in debating if literature has changed, because it has. And along with that change is our change of perception. Something will only die when we stop believing it will live. Anderson's optimism for criticism is refreshing and real.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Daisy...

When Fitzgerald first introduced us to Daisy, I found her quite likeable. She had a youthful spirit, and descriptions of her gave me the feeling that although her beauty wasn’t conventional, it was mesmerizing. Her personality was bold, and that was a characteristic I thoroughly enjoyed about her. However, her blind eye towards Tom’s infidelity was a disappointment. Her complete contempt of her life, yet her lack of motivation to change it was unsettling. Needless to say that by the time Daisy was flaunting her affair with Gatsby, just the thought of her character left a bitter taste in my mouth.

            Of course with the new development in the plot, it seems an obvious choice to voice my dislike of Daisy. Yet this feeling seeded long before her reckless driving and jumbled nerves ever came into play. Daisy is a selfish woman, who despite her entrancing personality, seems shallow enough to be ever so willing to constantly “trade-up”. Daisy has, unfortunately, evolved from my favorite character, to that seems to constantly disagree with me.